Found 10 Enz. Inhib. hit(s) for PDB: 2W9G 
Affinity DataKi: 1.20nMAssay Description:Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus DHFR using dihydrofolate as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition by spectrophotometr...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
3D Structure (crystal)Affinity DataKi: 1.24nMAssay Description:Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus DHFR assessed as oxidation of NADPH using dihydrofolate as substrate pre-incubated for 10 mins before substrate a...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.40nMAssay Description:Inhibition of recombinant Staphylococcus aureus DHFR expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells assessed as reduction in NADPH oxidation using dih...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 4.40nMAssay Description:Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus wild type recombinant DHFR by MTS assayMore data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 5.10nMAssay Description:Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureusMore data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 40nM ΔG°: -42.9kJ/mole IC50: 600nMpH: 7.0 T: 2°CAssay Description:Activity was measured as a change in absorbance over time at a wavelength of 340 nm (A340), so as to monitor the disappearance of NADPH. After incuba...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 5.50E+3nM ΔG°: -30.5kJ/mole IC50: 4.50E+4nMpH: 7.0 T: 2°CAssay Description:Activity was measured as a change in absorbance over time at a wavelength of 340 nm (A340), so as to monitor the disappearance of NADPH. After incuba...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 7nMpH: 7.0 T: 2°CAssay Description:Activity was measured as a change in absorbance over time at a wavelength of 340 nm (A340), so as to monitor the disappearance of NADPH. After incuba...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 14.4nMAssay Description:Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus wild type recombinant DHFR by MTS assayMore data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 23nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
